Violence In Burma


The day I decided to cover the Irrawaddy Literary Festival in Yangon (Rangoon) the BBC reported that 64 people had been killed in Burma’s western state of Rakhine, which is home to the Muslim Rohingya minority group. According to the BBC a total of 100,000 people have been displaced and some 180 killed since June 2012, when the rape and murder of a Buddhist woman by three Muslim men triggered violent retaliation.

The (very brief) backstory is that the Rohingya, who are linked by language, ethnicity and religion to neighbouring Bangladesh, are stateless. Burma considers them illegal migrants and Bangladesh wants nothing to do with them either. They live in the margins of each culture; welcome in neither.

Hence the drip-drip of disturbing news stories; images of thin, dark-skinned abject bodies; condemnations of Aung San Suu Kyi and the Burmese government for not speaking out and not doing more to protect the Rohingyas.

This media narrative is familiar because it is what we expect. Violence in remote, poor, foreign countries – especially ones whose religious and/or political arrangements we consider suspect – is presented by the Western press as inevitable.

When misfortune strikes the West – Hurricane Katrina or the London riots – it is treated as a terrible aberration. Barrels of ink and miles of column-inches express shock, outrage and upset. These things aren’t supposed to happen to us: the affluent, comfortable, light-skinned inheritors of the earth.

This is nonsense. Any country on the receiving end of media that focuses on negative stories is going to look bad. Burma has a population of 54.5 million — about the same as Great Britain. That means roughly the same number of human beings working, eating, love-making, squabbling, giving, sleeping, planning, aspiring, cheating and contemplating. The current strife in Rahkine is tragic and needs to be addressed but it is no more a true representation of Burma and its people than looting in Tottenham was representative of England and its people.

“Are you sure it’s safe?”
a friend asked when I announced my plans. I’ve thought about it and my answer is: “Yes”.
I don’t believe the news version of Burma is the same as the place itself. The only way to know – and to write truthfully – is to see for myself.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Violence In Burma

  1. It is tragic news. The figures of violence are not to be sniffed at. But you are right to highlight the British medias need to force feed those who will listen only negative news, and blanket whole populations with a broad, tarred brush. To know the world is to go and discover it for yourself. One day I’d like to see reporting highlight scientific discoveries, stories of amazing human endeavours and champion those who seek positive communal change.

    • Absolutely. My intention is not to “sniff at” or in any way diminish the violence, only to say that it isn’t the whole story about Burma. I share your dream of reporting that highlights the good in the world. You’re one of the people who is creating that with your blogs 🙂

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s